Exc h-f-nk-sp b9+marg 0.5/<
CPT 11420 covers the surgical removal of a small benign (non-cancerous) skin lesion that is 0.5 centimeters or smaller from the scalp, neck, hands, feet, or genitals, including a margin of healthy tissue around it.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Always measure the lesion diameter before excision and document the excised diameter (lesion plus margins) in the operative note, not just the lesion size alone
Impact: Incorrect measurement documentation is the leading cause of downcoding; difference between 11420 ($122.92) and next size code 11421 ($156.86) is $33.94
Bill based on excised diameter (lesion plus narrowest margin on each side), not pre-excision lesion size
Impact: A 0.3cm lesion with 0.2cm margins should be billed as 11421 (0.7cm excised diameter), resulting in 27% higher reimbursement
Verify anatomical site qualifies for 11420-11426 series; scalp, neck, hands, feet, and genitalia only—trunk/extremity lesions use lower-paying 11400 series
Impact: 11420 pays $122.92 vs comparable trunk lesion code 11400 at $107.79, a difference of $15.13 (14% higher)
When excising multiple lesions, bill each lesion separately with appropriate modifiers (59, RT/LT) and document each lesion's specific location and size
Impact: Proper modifier use prevents bundling; three lesions properly billed can yield $368.76 vs single payment of $122.92
Use non-facility rates ($122.92) when performed in office with your own equipment and supplies; facility rates ($81.19) apply only in hospital/ASC settings
Impact: Office-based procedures yield $41.73 more per procedure (51% higher reimbursement) compared to facility settings
Send pathology report with claim when appealing denials for medical necessity; benign designation should be clinical impression, not pathology-dependent
Reduces denial rate by approximately 30% and supports medical necessity determination for initially uncertain lesions
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.