Exc h-f-nk-sp b9+marg 0.6-1
CPT 11421 covers the surgical removal of a benign (non-cancerous) skin growth or lesion on the head, face, neck, hands, feet, or genitals when the lesion plus the margin removed measures between 0.6 and 1.0 centimeters in diameter.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Measure the excised diameter (lesion + margins) accurately and document in operative note; 11421 covers 0.6-1.0cm. If total diameter is 1.1cm, use 11422 instead.
Impact: Undercoding by one size category costs $47.55 per lesion (difference between 11421 at $154.62 and 11422 at $202.17); overcoding risks audits and recoupment
Bill multiple excisions separately when performed; arrange codes by reimbursement amount (highest first) to maximize payment under multiple procedure reduction rules.
Impact: First excision pays 100%, second pays 50%, third+ pay 50%; proper sequencing on claim form can increase payment by 20-30% compared to random ordering
Verify anatomical location qualifies for 11421 series (head/face/neck/hands/feet/genitals); trunk/arms/legs use 11401 series with different rates.
Impact: 11421 pays $154.62 vs 11401 (trunk, 0.6-1.0cm) pays $134.89; using wrong anatomic series results in $19.73 underpayment or audit exposure
Confirm pathology report states 'benign' before final billing; if malignant, rebill using appropriate 11640-11646 codes for higher reimbursement.
Impact: Malignant excision codes pay significantly more (11642 for 0.6-1.0cm face pays $220.45 vs $154.62 for 11421); waiting for pathology prevents $65.83 loss per lesion
Document medical necessity clearly when performing excisions for cosmetic concerns; Medicare and many payers deny purely cosmetic procedures.
Impact: Lack of medical necessity documentation results in 100% denial ($154.62 loss); acceptable indications include bleeding, irritation, infection risk, or diagnostic uncertainty
Use modifier 59 or XS appropriately when billing multiple excisions; document separate sites to justify distinct procedures and avoid bundling denials.
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.