Grfg autol fat lipo 50 cc/<
CPT 15771 covers autologous fat grafting procedures where 50 cubic centimeters (cc) or less of the patient's own fat is harvested via liposuction and injected into another area of the body for volume restoration or contouring.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Accurately measure and document total volume of fat harvested and injected; volumes exceeding 50cc require CPT 15772 or higher codes
Impact: Coding creep to higher volume codes without documentation can trigger $300-500 overpayment recovery per claim during audits
Bill facility versus non-facility settings correctly; same code but different rates ($600.03 non-facility vs $504.93 facility)
Impact: Incorrect place of service coding results in $95.10 differential and automatic claim rejections
Do not separately bill liposuction harvest codes (15876-15879) when performed solely for fat grafting; harvest is included in 15771
Impact: Unbundling harvest from grafting triggers NCCI edits and 100% denial of the liposuction code
When fat grafting is performed with other reconstructive procedures, append modifier 51 to 15771 if it's the secondary procedure to avoid payment delays
Impact: Proper modifier sequencing ensures correct multiple procedure reduction and prevents 50% underpayment on primary procedure
For breast reconstruction cases, verify if fat grafting qualifies under Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act coverage to prevent patient balance billing issues
Impact: WHCRA-covered procedures must be paid without additional patient cost-sharing; improper billing can result in compliance violations
Document medical necessity clearly, especially for cosmetic versus reconstructive indications; link to trauma, cancer, congenital defects, or disease-related volume loss
Impact: Cosmetic indications result in 100% patient responsibility; reconstructive coding with proper diagnosis can yield $600+ in covered benefits
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.