Dstrj mal les t/a/l >4.0 cm
CPT code 17266 is used when a physician destroys a malignant (cancerous) skin lesion on the trunk, arms, or legs that is larger than 4.0 centimeters using methods like freezing, laser, or chemical destruction.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Document exact lesion size in centimeters (not just '>4 cm') with measurement method (ruler, calipers, photographic documentation) before destruction to prevent downcoding
Impact: Prevents downcoding to 17264 (3.1-4.0 cm at $184.13), protecting $44.88 per lesion in reimbursement
Always confirm pathology report confirms malignancy before billing 17266; destruction of premalignant lesions requires different codes (17000-17004)
Impact: Prevents denials and potential fraud allegations; malignant vs premalignant coding difference is approximately $200+ per lesion
Bill facility code (17266 with POS 22 or 24) at $149.76 when performed in ASC or hospital versus non-facility rate of $229.01 in office to ensure correct reimbursement
Impact: Using wrong place of service can trigger $79.25 overpayment recoupment or audit flags
For multiple lesions destroyed in same session, bill 17266 for the largest lesion and use appropriate add-on codes or repeat 17266 with modifier 59 for additional qualifying lesions
Impact: Proper sequencing and modifier use prevents bundling and maximizes reimbursement at $229.01 per distinct lesion
Submit clean claims with ICD-10 codes specifying malignancy type (C44.x codes for skin malignancy) and anatomical site matching the trunk/arm/leg descriptor
Impact: Reduces denial rate by 30-40% and prevents medical necessity denials that delay payment 45-60 days
When destruction requires multiple treatment sessions, document each as separate encounters with updated measurements and clinical necessity for staged approach
Justifies billing for each session versus being bundled into single payment; can result in 2-3x reimbursement for complex cases
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.