Rmvl intact breast implant
CPT code 19328 is used when a surgeon removes a breast implant that is still intact (not ruptured or broken). This is different from removing a ruptured implant, which requires a different code.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Clearly document implant status as 'intact' in operative report. If any capsulectomy (partial or complete) is performed, consider codes 19371 or 19330 instead, which have higher RVUs and reimbursement.
Impact: Using 19371 for capsulectomy yields $793.57 (45% higher reimbursement) versus $546.66 for 19328
For bilateral procedures, append modifier 50 rather than billing two separate line items, as most payers require this approach for proper adjudication of paired organs.
Impact: Proper bilateral coding prevents denials and ensures approximately $820 total reimbursement versus risk of second side denial
Do not separately bill for implant pocket irrigation or drain placement as these are bundled services. However, if tissue expander is placed during same session, code 19357 may be separately billable.
Impact: 19357 adds $810.58 when appropriately documented as separate reconstructive stage
When performed with mastopexy (15877) or breast reduction (19318), ensure medical necessity is documented separately for each component to prevent denial of the implant removal as cosmetic.
Impact: Prevents denial of $546.66 claim when combined procedures raise cosmetic flags in payer systems
Submit operative report with initial claim for procedures requiring modifier 22 or when implant age exceeds 20 years, as these often trigger automatic review.
Impact: Reduces processing time by 15-30 days and decreases likelihood of automatic denial requiring appeal
Verify pre-authorization requirements specific to implant removal, as many commercial payers classify this differently than initial placement and may not require authorization even when placement did.
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.