Insj/rplcmt brst implt sep d
CPT code 19342 covers the surgical insertion or replacement of a breast implant performed on a separate day from the initial mastectomy or breast surgery. This includes reconstructive procedures where the implant is placed in a previously created pocket.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Always append RT or LT modifier to indicate laterality; use modifier 50 for bilateral procedures rather than billing two line items
Impact: Prevents automatic denial for missing laterality; proper bilateral coding ensures correct $1,123.23 payment vs. risk of single-side payment only
Document the separate date of service from mastectomy or tissue expander placement to support the 'separate day' component of the descriptor
Impact: Critical for distinguishing from immediate reconstruction codes (19340, 19361) which have different reimbursement rates and avoid bundling denials
Use modifier 58 when implant insertion follows tissue expander placement during the global period, with documentation showing staged/planned approach
Impact: Preserves full $748.82 reimbursement that would otherwise be denied as included in global surgical package
For revision cases, clearly document medical necessity (capsular contracture, implant rupture, malposition) to distinguish from cosmetic adjustments
Impact: Difference between full reimbursement and complete denial; Medicare does not cover cosmetic procedures
Bill with appropriate diagnosis codes linking to breast cancer history (Z85.3), post-mastectomy status (Z90.1-), or complications (T85.42XA for capsular contracture)
Impact: Establishes medical necessity for reconstruction; incorrect diagnosis coding is the #1 cause of denials for this procedure
When billing with modifier 22, include detailed operative note highlighting specific increased complexity factors and extra time (typically 25%+ beyond usual)
Potential additional reimbursement of $150-$375 when properly documented, but <30% approval rate without compelling documentation
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.