Revj peri-implt capsule brst

CPT code 19370 covers the surgical revision of the capsule tissue that forms around a breast implant, typically performed to correct capsular contracture or other complications related to the scar tissue surrounding the implant.

Showing rates for

National Average

Base Medicare rate

$661.49

This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.

RVU breakdown

Work RVU

9.17

PE RVU (NF)

9.58

MP RVU

1.7

Total RVU

20.45

Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High

NCCI bundling edits

Loading bundling edits…

Billing tips

Document medical necessity with specific Baker grade classification for capsular contracture (Grade III or IV), pain scores, ROM limitations, or photographic evidence of deformity
Impact: Critical for reimbursement - lack of medical necessity documentation is the #1 denial reason; can mean difference between $661.49 payment and $0 denial
For bilateral procedures, verify payer policy on modifier 50 vs. RT/LT line-item billing before claim submission
Impact: Prevents $330.74 underpayment - some payers reject modifier 50 and require two line items; incorrect format delays payment 30-45 days
When performed with implant exchange, bill 19370 for capsule work and 19328/19330 for implant exchange; append modifier 51 to secondary procedure
Impact: Ensures separate payment for each distinct component; failure to unbundle can result in $661.49 loss if capsule work bundled into implant exchange
Code selection depends on whether implants remain: use 19370 if implant retained or exchanged; use 19328/19330 if implant removed without replacement and includes capsulectomy
Impact: Incorrect code selection can trigger $200-400 payment variance; 19370 specifically for capsule revision with implant retention/exchange
For reconstruction patients (post-mastectomy), link appropriate breast cancer diagnosis codes (Z42.1, Z85.3, C50.x) to support medical rather than cosmetic indication
Impact: Reconstruction-related capsule revisions typically have 85-90% approval rate vs. 40-50% for augmentation-related revisions without clear medical necessity
Submit operative report with claim for modifier 22 requests showing extended operative time, blood loss, complexity factors; include comparison to typical procedure time

Live Field Datano reports yet

Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.

Working with CPT 19370?

Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.

Help build the field knowledge

MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.

Related actions

Frequently asked questions

What is the Medicare reimbursement rate for CPT code 19370 in 2025?

The 2025 Medicare national average reimbursement for CPT 19370 is $661.49 for both facility and non-facility settings. This rate is based on 20.45 total RVUs (9.17 work RVU, 9.58 practice expense RVU, 1.7 malpractice RVU) multiplied by the 2025 conversion factor of 32.3465. Actual payments may vary based on geographic location and MAC-specific adjustments.

Does insurance cover capsule revision surgery (CPT 19370)?

Insurance coverage for CPT 19370 depends on medical necessity documentation. Most payers cover capsule revision when performed to correct complications like Baker Grade III or IV capsular contracture, implant malposition causing functional impairment, or chronic pain with objective findings. Coverage is typically denied when the procedure is considered cosmetic improvement. Post-mastectomy reconstruction-related revisions have higher coverage rates than augmentation-related revisions.

Can CPT 19370 be billed with breast implant exchange codes?

Yes, CPT 19370 can be billed separately with implant exchange codes (19328, 19330) when significant capsule work beyond routine capsulotomy is performed. Append modifier 51 to the secondary procedure and ensure operative documentation clearly describes the distinct capsule revision work. Simple capsulotomy performed during implant exchange is considered bundled and should not be separately reported. Documentation must support the additional complexity and time for extensive capsulectomy.

What modifier should I use for bilateral capsule revision?

For bilateral capsule revision, use either modifier 50 (bilateral procedure) on a single line or bill two separate line items with RT (right) and LT (left) modifiers. Verify payer-specific requirements before submission as policies vary. Modifier 50 typically reimburses at 150% of the single-side rate ($992.24 for Medicare), while RT/LT line-item billing may reimburse 100% per side ($661.49 each) depending on payer policy.

How do I justify medical necessity for CPT 19370?

Document medical necessity with: Baker Grade classification (Grade III or IV contracture requires objective firmness/deformity findings), pain assessment scores with failed conservative management, photographic evidence of asymmetry or deformity, functional limitations documented in clinical notes, prior treatment attempts, and duration of symptoms. Link appropriate diagnosis codes (T85.44XA for capsular contracture, M79.3 for panniculitis). Post-mastectomy reconstruction patients should include breast cancer history codes (Z85.3, Z42.1).

What is the RVU value for CPT code 19370?

CPT code 19370 has a total RVU value of 20.45 for 2025, consisting of 9.17 work RVUs, 9.58 practice expense RVUs (both facility and non-facility), and 1.7 malpractice RVUs. This places it in the moderate complexity surgical procedure range, reflecting the technical skill and time required for capsule revision surgery.

What are common denial reasons for CPT 19370 and how can they be prevented?

Common denials include: cosmetic/not medically necessary (prevent with Baker Grade documentation and objective findings), bundling with implant exchange codes (prevent with detailed operative reports showing distinct capsule work), global period edits (prevent with appropriate modifier 58/78), and laterality errors (prevent with RT/LT or modifier 50). Proactive documentation of medical necessity, clear operative descriptions of capsule work extent, and correct modifier usage prevent 70-80% of initial denials.