Excision of facial bone(s)
CPT code 21026 covers the surgical removal of facial bone tissue, typically performed to treat bone lesions, tumors, infections, or deformities affecting the facial skeleton. This is a complex surgical procedure requiring precise documentation of the specific bone(s) removed and the surgical approach used.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Document specific facial bone(s) excised with precise anatomical terminology (mandibular body vs ramus, maxillary alveolus vs sinus wall, etc.)
Impact: Prevents downcoding to E/M services; ensures proper code selection versus 21025 or 21029-21034 which have different payment rates
Bill in non-facility setting when possible as payment difference is $105.45 higher ($535.98 vs $430.53)
Impact: Increases revenue by 24.5% for eligible ASC or office-based procedures versus hospital outpatient department
Include pathology report and pre-operative imaging in claim submission to establish medical necessity for bone excision
Impact: Reduces denial rate by 40-60% for procedures requiring prior authorization or those flagged for medical review
When bilateral excision is performed, use modifier 50 rather than billing two units, as many payers reject unit-based billing for this code
Impact: Ensures proper payment of approximately $804 versus risk of complete denial or payment for single side only
Separate bone excision (21026) from any reconstruction codes (21141-21145, 21210, etc.) with clear documentation of distinct procedures
Impact: Prevents bundling; reconstruction codes add $800-$3,500 in additional reimbursement when properly documented as separate procedures
For extensive excisions requiring modifier 22, submit with cover letter quantifying additional time (typically >50% beyond usual) and complexity factors
Impact: Successful modifier 22 appeals can increase payment by $100-$150 but require peer review documentation
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.