Ct maxillofacial w/o & w/dye
CPT code 70488 covers a CT scan of the face and jaw area performed twice: first without contrast dye, then with contrast dye injected to highlight blood vessels and tissues for better imaging.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Document medical necessity for dual-phase imaging specifically - explain why both non-contrast and contrast phases are required rather than coding 70486 (without) or 70487 (with only)
Impact: Prevents downcoding to 70487 which reimburses approximately $30-40 less; reduces denial rate by 35%
Verify contrast administration is documented in radiology report with type, amount, and route - payers audit contrast billing heavily
Impact: Missing contrast documentation results in automatic downcoding to 70486 ($181.14 vs approximately $140), losing $40+ per claim
Split-bill 26/TC components when radiologist does not own equipment (hospital-based radiologists) to ensure proper reimbursement flow
Impact: Prevents payment delays and ensures correct party receives payment; hospital gets TC ($108.68) and physician gets 26 ($72.46)
Use diagnosis codes that clearly justify dual-phase imaging such as D49.0 (neoplasm), S02.4 (facial bone fracture), or J32.9 (chronic sinusitis) with complication codes
Impact: Reduces prior authorization denials by 40%; non-specific codes like R51 (headache) generate automatic denials
Check for recent prior authorization requirements - many commercial payers now require pre-auth for all contrast CT scans including 70488
Impact: Prevents 100% denial; retro-authorization attempts succeed only 15-20% of time, risking full $181.14 write-off
Bundle interpretation with same-day E/M only when documented as separate, distinct service with modifier 25 on E/M - never on imaging code
Improper modifier placement results in denial of entire E/M service (typically $75-150 loss in addition to imaging)
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.