Ct thorax dx c-/c+
CPT code 71270 represents a CT scan of the chest performed twice: once without contrast dye, then again after injecting contrast material into a vein. This dual-phase imaging helps doctors see blood vessels, tumors, and other chest abnormalities more clearly than a single scan.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Verify medical necessity documentation specifically justifies BOTH non-contrast and contrast phases before billing 71270
Impact: Prevents downcoding to 71260 (contrast only) or 71250 (non-contrast only), which would reduce reimbursement by approximately $40-60 per study
Confirm contrast administration documentation includes type, volume, route, and timing to support the contrast-enhanced component
Impact: Missing contrast documentation triggers automatic denials or audits; recovery requires chart amendments and appeals, delaying payment 45-90 days
Review indication to ensure it supports dual-phase imaging rather than single-phase protocol (71250 or 71260)
Impact: Inappropriate use of 71270 when 71260 is indicated results in overpayment recoveries averaging $50-70 per case in audits
Separate professional and technical components when different entities provide interpretation versus imaging
Impact: Failure to split components causes payment to wrong provider and requires costly refund/rebilling; use modifier 26 or TC appropriately
Check for recent prior chest CT studies to avoid duplicate service denials within short timeframes
Impact: Medicare may deny studies within 30 days of previous chest CT without clear documentation of clinical change; use modifier 76 with strong justification
Ensure ACR accreditation and contrast safety protocols are current, as payers increasingly verify before processing claims
Impact: Non-accredited facilities face denials or 15-25% payment reductions; accreditation lapses can trigger retroactive claim reviews
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.