Dilation urtr/urt rs&i
CPT 74485 covers the radiologic supervision and interpretation (RS&I) portion when a physician monitors and documents the imaging component of dilating a narrowed ureter or urethra. This is the imaging oversight service, not the actual dilation procedure itself.
This calculator gives a typical-case estimate using standard Medicare modifier rules. Actual payment depends on payer policies, documentation, code-specific CMS status indicators, and locality. Verify before billing.
RVU breakdown
Conversion factor: 32.3465 · Source: CMS MPFS RVU25A · Confidence: High
NCCI bundling edits
Loading bundling edits…
Billing tips
Always bill 74485 with the corresponding dilation procedure code (e.g., 50395, 50706, 52341) on the same claim to demonstrate medical necessity
Impact: Prevents automatic denial for lack of corresponding procedure; failure to pair results in 80%+ denial rate
Submit separate written interpretation report that explicitly documents fluoroscopic guidance, stricture characteristics, and procedural monitoring
Impact: Required documentation element; absence triggers audit and recoupment of full $114.18 payment
Verify payer-specific policies on bilateral procedures - some require modifier 50 while others prefer RT/LT on separate lines
Impact: Incorrect bilateral billing can result in 50% underpayment or complete denial of second side
Do not bill 74485 if only pre-procedure or post-procedure static imaging is performed; real-time fluoroscopic guidance during dilation is required
Impact: Incorrect reporting without intra-procedural imaging results in denial and potential fraud investigation
Append modifier 26 in facility settings where hospital owns equipment unless you have a contractual arrangement documenting professional component billing rights
Impact: Prevents duplicate billing denials; incorrect global billing in facility setting triggers automatic $114.18 recoupment
Check NCCI edits before billing with other radiologic supervision codes from the same session; many RS&I codes are mutually exclusive
Impact: Bundling violations result in denial of secondary code; can lose $100+ in legitimate separate procedures if not properly documented with modifier 59
Real billers contribute denial patterns and appeal strategies for this code. Once 5+ reports come in, you’ll see live aggregated data here — the only place this exists, free.
Get the free Revenue Protection Toolkit — the denial triggers, modifier pitfalls, and bundling conflicts that quietly cost you reimbursement. Instant download.
Help build the field knowledge
MedPayIQ gets smarter as billers contribute. If you've had this code denied, share what happened so others learn from it. Anonymous, no patient info.